Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22257 (ALL)

SMT TAHIRA FATIMA KHAN v. State of UP AND ANOTHER

CRLR/2254/2024 · 2025-09-17

Madan Pal Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2254 of 2024 Court No. - 91 HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J. 1. Heard Mohd. Asim Zulfiquar, learned counsel for the revisionist, Mr. Shrey Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and the learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. On the matter being taken up today, learned counsel for the revisionist submits that since both the parties have settled their disputes and also they have entered into a compromise. Therefore, he does not want to press the present writ petition and the same be dismissed as not pressed, as nothing survives in the present criminal revision. 3. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and the learned A.G.A. for the State could not dispute the above submission. 4. The present writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed. September 18, 2025 Sushil/- Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Mohd. Asim Zulfiquar, S A Husain Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shrey Singh (Madan Pal Singh,J.) Smt Tahira Fatima Khan .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad