Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22254 (AP)

MADAPU AYYANNA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/15954/2025 · 2025-06-30

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010314342025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15954/2025 Between: 1. MADAPU AYYANNA, S/O MADAPU MADILETI, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O 3RD FLOOR, FLAT NO.306, TRADE FAIR OFFICE BUILDING, HITEX EXHIBITION CENTRE, IZZATH NAGAR, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUTI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE, O/O MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANNAMAYA, ANNAMAYA DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, O/O TIRUPATI DIVISION, ANNAMAYA DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TIRUPATI RURAL POLICE STATION, ANNAMAYA DISTRICT. 6. MANNEM PRASAD, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, MANNEM PUMPS AND VALVES, FLAT NO.D.-1-97, STREET TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, PUDIPATIA VILLAGE, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT- 517505. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the 2 HN, J W.P.No.15954 of 2025 nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.5 in interfering into the peaceful life and liberty of the petitioner and interfering into civil disputes between the petitioner and the respondent No.6 and calling the petitioner to the police station and detaining him and threatening to pay amount to the respondent Nos.6, without having any jurisdiction highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.5 not to interfere into the peaceful life and liberty of the petitioner and not to interfere into civil disputes between the petitioner and the respondent No.6, not to call the petitioner to the police station and not to detain him and not threaten to pay amount to the respondent Nos.6 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No.5 not to interfere into the peaceful life and liberty of the petitioner and not to interfere into civil disputes between the petitioner and the respondent No.6, not to call the petitioner to the police station and not to detain him and not threaten to pay amount to the respondent Nos.6 pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRIDEVI JAMPANI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 HN, J W.P.No.15954 of 2025 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5. 2. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the 5th respondent not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the 6th respondent, except by following due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 1st July, 2025 cbn 4 HN, J W.P.No.15954 of 2025 234 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.15954 of 2025 1st July, 2025 cbn