1 ( 2025:HHC:3554 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA FAO (FC) No.36 of 2023 Decided on: 27.02.2025 Parul Dhiman .. …..Appellant Versus Suraj Dhiman ….Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the Appellant: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman, Advocate. Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge ( Oral ) Learned counsel for the respondent on instructions states that he may be permitted to withdraw the main petition i.e. petition under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 bearing registration No. H.M.A. No.43 of 2018, RBT No. 43 of 2020. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant obviously has no objection to the same. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes 2 ( 2025:HHC:3554 ) 3. Consequently, the petition being H.M.A. No. 43 of 2018 is deemed to be withdrawn. Consequently, the instant appeal is rendered infructuous and disposed of as such so also the pending application(s), if any. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Sushil Kukreja) Judge 27th February, 2025. (yogesh/pankaj)