NOHABAT SINGH S/O SHRI NANGA RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/360/2020 · 2025-01-09
Sudesh Bansal
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2225 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2225 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:1326] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 360/2020 Nohabat Singh S/o Shri Nanga Ram, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Satya Nagar, Post-Ajau, Tehsil Kumher, Ajau, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter (Phq), Lalkothi, Jaipur.
2. The Inspector General Of Police, Rac, Range Third Rajasthan Jaipur.
3. The Deputy Inspector General Of Police, Rac, Range First Rajasthan Jaipur.
4. The Commandant, Seventh Bataliyan, Rac, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Sharma Ms. Pankaj Solanki For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 09/01/2025
1. Instant civil writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner on 02.01.2020, impugning the penalty order dated 30.10.2004 whereby and whereunder one annual grade increment without cumulative effect was stopped as also against dismissal of his departmental appeal filed thereagainst vide order dated 24.03.2005.
2. Having heard counsel for the petitioner, it is apparent that writ petition has been filed after a delay of about more than 19 years and further the penalty imposed against the petitioner
[2025:RJ-JP:1326] (2 of 2) [CW-360/2020] considering the charges levelled against the petitioner (constable) for misusing his power and position to create a ruckus and misbehave in public in drunken state, due to which the image of police was tarnished, cannot be held to be disproportionate.
3. After arguing the writ petition and having instructions from the petitioner, counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition.
4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
5. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J SOURAV /16