CRM-A-1074-MA-2017 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 228-2 CRM-A-1074-MA-2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 25.07.2025 DEV RAJ ....APPELLANT V/s SUKHWINDER SINGH ....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: None for the appellant/applicant. Mr. Dinesh Sharma, Advocate for the complainant. ***** SUMEET GOEL , J. (Oral) 1. The substantive prayer made in the present appeal reads, thus: “i. To quash & set aside impugned judgment dated 13.02.2017 passed by Ld. Trail court with costs and the accused be convicted and sentenced as per law. To allow the complaint filed by the Appellant / Complainant in the interest of justice and order the Respondent to make the payment of Rs 3,85,000/- (Rs. Three lacs eighty five thousands only) alongwith interest of 12% p.a. from the date of payment made till the date of realization of payment. To exempt the typed copy of the impugned judgment dated 13.2.2017 Annexures and the certified copies & 1/3 margin of the documents annexed with the present appeal. Any other order as deem just & proper in the favour of the Appellant & against the respondent.” Alongwith an appeal, an application for grant of leave has also been preferred under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C., 1973 2. I have perused the paper-book. 3. Before proceeding to consider the application (for grant of special leave to appeal)/appeal, it would be apposite to refer herein to a judgment passed by this Court in CRM-A-826-2025 titled as Raj Kumar vs. JATIN 2025.07.25 15:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-A-1074-MA-2017 (O&M) 2 Rajender : 2025:PHHC:079740 wherein, this Court, while relying upon the dicta of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in M/s Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc. 2025 INSC 804 : 2025(3) RCR (Criminal) 208, has held that an appeal against an order of acquittal in a proceeding under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 preferred by the complainant, falls squarely within the purview of proviso to Section 372 of Cr.P.C./413 of BNSS, 2023. This judicial enunciation was predicated upon the interpretative understanding that, for the purposes of a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the complainant is encompassed within the expansive definition of ‘victim’ as delineated in the Cr.P.C., 1973/BNSS, 2023. Consequently, the complainant is not constrained to pursue the more stringent procedure of seeking special leave to appeal under Section 378(4) of Cr.P.C., 1973/419(4) of BNSS, 2023. This Court underscored that the scope and ambit of proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C./413 BNSS are inherently broader and more accommodating when juxtaposed with the comparatively narrower confines of Section 378(4) of Cr.P.C., 1973/419(4) of BNSS, 2023, which mandates the procurement of special leave from the High Court for an appeal against an acquittal in a complaint case. However, demonstrating a profound commitment to the overarching principles of justice and a determination to preclude mere procedural technicalities from eclipsing the substantive adjudication of the case, this Court, instead of summarily dismissing the appeal on this technical infirmity, judiciously opted to relegate the appeal, along with accompanying application(s), to the concerned Sessions Court. 4. Ergo; in view of the dicta of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in M/s Celestium Financial (supra) as also the pronouncement of this Court in Raj JATIN 2025.07.25 15:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-A-1074-MA-2017 (O&M) 3 Kumar (supra); the present appeal, along with accompanying application(s), is disposed of as hereunder: (i) The present appeal, along with accompanying application(s), is remitted to the learned Sessions Judge, Yamuna Nagar with a direction to treat the same as having been filed under Section 372 of Cr.P.C., 1973/Section 413 of BNSS, 2023. The said learned Sessions Judge may entrust the appeal to himself or assign it to another Court of competent jurisdiction for its disposal, as per law. (ii) Needless to clarify that this Court has not delved into the merits of the appeal as also along with accompanying application(s); and the same is left open for consideration of the concerned learned Sessions Court, which shall indubitably adjudicate the same without getting influenced by any observation made hereinabove. (iii). The Registry is directed to send, expeditiously, the complete records of the present appeal (including the paper-book) to the said learned Sessions Judge. (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE July 25, 2025 jatin Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No JATIN 2025.07.25 15:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document