- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2199 RFA No. 892 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 892 OF 2023 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. DHANALAKSHMI D/O. D.RAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT BIDALURU VILLAGE, BENAGALURU RURAL. 2. SMT. SUJATHA D/O. D.RAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO. WARD NO. 22, PRASHANTHANAGAR, DEVANAHALLI, BANGALORE-562 110. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. KIRAN.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. RAMANNA S/O. LATE DODDANNA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 2. SRI. R.SRINIVAS S/O. D.RAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 3. SRI. R.VENUGOPAL S/O. D.RAMANNA, AGED ABOUT YEARS, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2199 RFA No. 892 of 2023 ALL ARE R/AT NO. 141, ABHINANDA NILAYA, NEAR MILK DAIRY, SHANAMANGALA, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT. 4. SRI. K.R.PRAKASH S/O. LATE RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT KETHOHALLI VILLAGE, CHUNCHANAGUPPE POST, THAVAREKERE HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK. 5. SRI. R.CHANDRAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, S/O. RUDRAPPA, BANASHANKARI NILAYA, NO. 315/6TH CROSS, I STAGE, K.S.LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 078. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.M.ASHOKA., ADVOCATE FOR C/R4; SRI. J.S.KRISHNAMURTHY., ADVOCATE C/R5) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before Registrar (P & H) on several dates and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the appeal was listed before the Court and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Once again - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2199 RFA No. 892 of 2023 the appeal was listed on 06.01.2025, on that day, finally a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the appeal under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’ on 20.01.2025. The appeal is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the appellants have not complied with the office objections. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. In view of peremptory order dated 06.01.2025, the appeal is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34