Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22244 (RAJ)

PRATHVIRAJ SINGH ALIAS GAURAV SINGH ALIAS TINNA S/O SHIVRAJ SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7915/2025 · 2025-09-23

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:39110] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7915/2025 Prathviraj Singh Alias Gaurav Singh Alias Tinna S/o Shivraj Singh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Mangrol Police Station Mangrol District Baran. (At Present Confined At Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girraj P. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Govind Gupta Mr. Shailesh Kumar Panwar Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 23/09/2025 1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Prathviraj Singh Alias Gaurav Singh Alias Tinna seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.62/2025 dated 18.03.2025 registered at P.S. Sangod, District – Kota Rural, for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1) and 189(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicant does not [2025:RJ-JP:39110] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-7915/2025] have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time. 3. Learned counsel for applicant submits that Coordinate Bench has already allowed bail application of co-accused Vikram Singh @ Antu and after investigation, police has already filed a charge-sheet. He further submits that complainant and injured both have entered into a compromise with present applicant and they have no objection for grant of bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. Learned counsel for complainant acknowledged the compromise and submits that complainant and injured have no objection, in case, bail is granted to applicant-accused Prathviraj Singh Alias Gaurav Singh Alias Tinna. 5. Heard learned counsels for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. On basis of report lodged by complainant Jagdish on 18.03.2025 for incident of night of 17.03.2025, the matter is investigated and present applicant is arrested during investigation. After investigation, a charge-sheet has already been filed. The co-accused Vikram Singh @ Antu was enlarged on bail by a Coordinate Bench on 11.06.2025. Yogendra Suman (injured) and Jagdish Suman (complainant) have entered into a compromise with both the accused and [2025:RJ-JP:39110] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-7915/2025] Yogendra Suman has already executed an affidavit in favour of present applicant. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicants-accused Prathviraj Singh Alias Gaurav Singh Alias Tinna, is hereby allowed and ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. [2025:RJ-JP:39110] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-7915/2025] 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /64