1 APHC010313412018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14324/2018 Between: Ch.venkata Ramanaiah ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A G SATYANARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SANISETTY VENKATESWARLU SC For APSRTC The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…..to issue an appropriate writ or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the office order No.E2/756(2)/2018-PDL dated 29.03.2018 retiring the petitioner from service on medical grounds with effect from 13.03.2018, is unjust, arbitrary, contrary to the Rights of persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, discriminatory in violation of Article 14 and Article 21 of the Constitution of India, set aside the same and consequently direct the Respondents to provide suitable alternative post of Record Tracer to the petitioner as per Section 20 (4) of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act,2016, duly protecting the pay scale of the post of Conductor with all 2 consequential service benefits including payment of salary for the interregnum period, in the interest of justice and fair play and pass such other order or orders……” 2. Heard Sri A.G.Satyanarayana Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sanisetty Venkateswarlu, learned Standing Counsel for APSRTC, appearing for the respondents 2 to 6. 3. Learned Standing Counsel would submit that as ordered by this Court, the petitioner was sent to medical examination and thereafter the petitioner was appointed as Record Tracer. The petition may be disposed of recording the same. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Considering the submissions made, there are not further orders are required in this matter. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 03.04.2025 ARR 3 13 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14324/2018 Dt.03.04.2025 ARR