AATISH KHANDELWAL S/O LATE SITARAM KHANDELWAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/7926/2025 · 2025-06-25
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22238 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22238 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:23510] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7926/2025 Aatish Khandelwal S/o Late Sitaram Khandelwal, R/o Flat No. 216, Vyas Apartment, Sector No. 11, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur. (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumit Kasawa For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shri Ram Dhakar, PP Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL (V. J.) Order 25/06/2025
1. Instant bail application has been filed by petitioner under Section 483 B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.245/2024 registered at Police Station Sodala, District Jaipur City (South) for offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC.
2. Heard counsel for petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3. Having considered the allegations leveled in the FIR, in respect of selling gold biscuits and the facts that; gold biscuits were recovered from one Warish Khan, who along with other co- accused, namely, Sarvesh Kumar Tiwari, Sachin Kumar Pal, Amit Tomar & Deepak Patel etc. have already been released on bail by
[2025:RJ-JP:23510] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7926/2025] the Coordinate Bench of this Court; there is no recovery from the petitioner; Offences are triable by Magistrate, but without commenting on merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.
4. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Aatish Khandelwal S/o Late Sitaram Khandelwal shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
5. However, taking into consideration the fact that one criminal case of similar nature is pending against the petitioner, in addition to above mentioned conditions, it is hereby directed that the petitioner shall not repeat the similar nature of offence during bail granted by this Court and shall not leave District- Jaipur without prior permission of concerned trial Court.
(SUDESH BANSAL ( V. J.)),J Sachin/63