Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22229 (CHH)

DEEPAK KUMAR MANHAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3636/2025 · 2025-06-08

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:22715 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3636 of 2025 1 - Deepak Kumar Manhar S/o Late Mr. Ghasiram Manhar Aged About 39 Years Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Nagaridih, Block Navagarh, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Director Panchayat Chhattisgarh Directorate Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Director, Directorate Public Instruction Department Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - The District Panchayat Janjgir-Champa, Through- Its Chief Executive Officer, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. 6 - The District Education Officer Janjgir-Champa, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.06.10 17:33:07 +0530 2 7 - Janpad Panchayat Navagarh, Through- Its Chief Executive Officer, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. 8 - Block Education Officer Block- Navagarh, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. A.S. Rajput, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 09/06/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner who was working as Assistant Teacher (L.B.) at Govt. Primary School Nagaridih, Block Navagarh, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, seeking a direction towards the respondents for promotion to the post of Teacher (Panchayat) from the post of Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) with effect from 2012. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the CEO Zila Panchayat has already sent the list of eligible Assistant Teachers (Panchayat) who are eligible for promotion to the post of Teacher and also stated that the General Administration Committee of the Zila Panchayat vide its resolution dated 14.01.2025 has also recommended the name of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Teacher. 3 3. Learned counsel for the respondents, on instruction, submits that the communication of the Zila Panchayat which has been stated by the petitioner is under consideration by the respondent Director Panchayat and the said recommendation is pending for decision of the Director. The Director Panchayat will take a decision on the recommendation made by the Zila Panchayat within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard both the parties and perused the pleadings of the petitioner. 5. It appears from the pleadings as well as the relief sought by the petitioner that the petitioner is seeking a direction towards the Director Panchayat to take a decision on the recommendation made by the Zila Panchayat by which it has recommended grant of promotion to the petitioner from the post of Assistant Teacher to Teacher (Panchayat). 6. Looking to the submission made by the State counsel, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities/ Director Panchayat to take a decision on the recommendation made by the Zila Panchayat within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law. The petitioner may apprise the Director Panchayat about the order of this Court. 7. With the aforesaid direction, these writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved