TAEEB ALAM SON OF SHRI SIRAJ AHMED v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
HC/210/2025 · 2025-07-08
Avneesh Jhingan, Bhuwan Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22224 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22224 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:25056-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 210/2025 Taeeb Alam Son Of Shri Siraj Ahmed, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Rai Walo Ki Dharamshala Ke Peeche, Mata Ji Ke Mandir Ke Pass, Chhipabarod, District Baran (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Home Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate, Jaipur
3. Superintendent Of Police, District Baran (Raj.)
4. Station House Officer, Police Station Chhipabarod, District Baran (Raj.).
5. Ved Prakash Goyal S/o Shri Unknown, R/o Main Bajar, Police Station Chhipabarod, District Baran (Raj.).
6. Beena Goyal W/o Shri Ved Prakash Goyal, R/o Main Bajar, Police Station Chhipabarod, District Baran (Raj.).
7. Aditya Goyal S/o Shri Ved Prakash Goyal, R/o Main Bajar, Police Station Chhipabarod, District Baran (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, AGA with Mr. Aman Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order 08/07/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at length is not pressing this petition with liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law.
[2025:RJ-JP:25056-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-210/2025] The petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. There is no doubt in eventuality of petitioner availing the remedies, the Forum concerned shall consider the same in accordance with law expeditiously.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Anu /24