ADITYA JANGID S/O ANIL JANGID v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/3701/2025 · 2025-07-03
Anand Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22222 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22222 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:24450] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 3701/2025 Aditya Jangid S/o Anil Jangid, R/o D 60, Ambabadi, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur City (North), Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through the Learned Public Prosecutor
2. Chhoturam S/o Naturam, R/o Naathooraam Mirdha Kee Dhaanee, Sinwar, Bindayaka, Jaipur (West), Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Joshi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 03/07/2025
1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. in
order to challenge FIR No.88/2025 registered with Police Station- Bindayaka, District-Jaipur (West) for committing offence under Sections 316(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) & 61(2) of B.N.S.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the contents of FIR would reveal that FIR has been lodged in respect of sale of one factory belongs to Jayesh Jangid who entered into one agreement with the complainant.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner has nothing to do with the matter. He neither owns the factory in question nor has received any penny towards the alleged sale proceeds/consideration, however, only on account of the facts that the co-accused Jayesh Jangid is relative of the petitioner, he has been falsely implicated.
[2025:RJ-JP:24450] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3701/2025]
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that even otherwise nature of allegation are civil having no criminal elements whatsoever.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the petition.
6. In view of above contents mentioned in the criminal miscellaneous petition it would be in the interest of justice to direct the petitioner to make a representation before the Investigating Officer and, in case, any representation is made the Investigating Officer shall investigate the same and take decision in accordance with the law. In case, any offence is alleged to be made out against the petitioner then before taking any coercive action notice of 14 days shall be given to the petitioner.
7. In view of above, the criminal miscellaneous petitioner shall stand disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/79