Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22222 (ALL)

VINEET KUMAR v. SMT. SUKHDA SRIVASTAV AND 16 OTHERS

A227/1834/2025 · 2025-02-23

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:26110 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1834 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vineet Kumar Respondent :- Smt. Sukhda Srivastav And 16 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ambrish Kumar Kashyap,Shive Datta Yadav Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. This is a petition on behalf of judgment debtor. The objections filed under Section 47 CPC in the execution proceedings were rejected by the executing Court. Against the order of the executing Court, a revision along with stay application has been filed by the petitioner which is registered as Misc. Case No.21 of 2025. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for early disposal of the stay application filed in the revision. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, or calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to the private respondents, the matter is being disposed of, at the admission stage, with a direction upon Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.1, Farrukhabad to decide the stay application dated 07.02.2025 filed in the revision, after hearing all the concerned parties, strictly in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. Order Date :- 24.2.2025 SK Goswami Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad