Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22215 (GAU)

THE BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. HAMIDA SIKDAR AND 7 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/4027/2024 · 2025-01-28

Malasri Nandi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010274362024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/4027/2024 THE BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED AND HEAD OFFICE AT GE PLAZA, AIRPORT ROAD, NERADA, PUNE-411006 AND NORTH ESTERN REGIONAL OFFICE AT SREEJI TOWER, 2ND FLOOR, C/O. GAUHATI TEA WAREHOUSING PVT. LTD., ADJACENT TO MAHINDRA SHOWROOM, CHRISTIAN BASTI, GUWAHATI, PIN-781005, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. (REP. BY ITS HUB-IN- CHARGE, APPEAL AND SPECALISED CLAIMS DEPARTMENT, MR. NAYAN CHOUDHURY). VERSUS HAMIDA SIKDAR AND 7 ORS W/O. LATE HASHEEM ALI 2:JERIFA HABIB RUNA D/O. LATE HASHEEM ALI 3:SHARIFA HABIB RUBI D/O. LATE HASHEEM ALI 4:HABIB REKIBUZ ZAMAN S/O. LATE HASHEEM ALI. ALL ARE R/O. VILL. BANIARAPARA P/O. GAREMARI P/S. BARPETA DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-782314. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT LAKHIMINAGAR HATIGAON P/S. HATIGAON KAMRUP(M) Page No.# 2/4 ASSAM PIN-781038. 5:SUYAL SINGH BASUMATARY S/O. KHAGEN BASUMATARY R/O. SALBARI P/S. SALBARI DIST. BAKSA BTAD ASSAM PIN-781320. 6:KHEM NATH ADHIKARY S/O. LATE NANDA LAL ADHIKARY R/O. DHIRUMAL ANANDA NAGAR FLAT NO. Q1 GUWAHATI DIST. KAMRUP(M) ASSAM. 7:RABIA KHATUN W/O. MAHAMMAD ALI 8:MAHAMMAD ALI S/O. LATE PANDIT ALI. BOTH ARE R/O. VILL. BANIARAPARA P/O. GAREMARI P/S. BARPETA DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-782314 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR T KALITA, MR. A KAKATI Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A T SARKAR (R-1,2,3), MR A HUSSAIN(R-1,2,3),AMINUR RAHMAN(R-1,2,3) Linked Case : THE BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD Page No.# 3/4 VERSUS HAMIDA SIKDAR AND 7 ORS ------------ Advocate for : MR T KALITA Advocate for : appearing for HAMIDA SIKDAR AND 7 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI ORDER 29.01.2025 Heard Mr. T. Kalita, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. Aminur Rahman, learned counsel for the respondents. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, read with Section 173 of the M.V Act for condoning delay of 123 days against the judgment and order dated 06.03.20124 passed by the learned Member, MACT No.3, Kamrup(M), Guwahati, Assam in MAC Case No.665/2019. The grounds of delay as stated in the petition are found to be not satisfactory. However, the learned counsel for the claimants/respondent nos.1 to 4 has made no objection in condoning the delay. Page No.# 4/4 The prayer of the applicant is allowed. Accordingly, the delay of 123 days is hereby condoned. Accordingly, the interlocutory application stands disposed of. Registry is directed to register the connected appeal and list the same for admission hearing. JUDGE Comparing Assistant