TARUN URF BHATTI S/O PURANMAL SAINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/7964/2025 · 2025-06-24
Sudesh Bansal V J
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22210 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22210 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:23444] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7964/2025
1. Tarun Urf Bhatti S/o Puranmal Saini, R/o Sabji Mandi, Police Station Ramgarh District Alwar (Raj.)
2. Gurudayal Urf Gaurav Urf Gutiyari S/o Birbal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Khillora, Police Station Ramgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
3. Vasudev Nayak S/o Yadram Nayak, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Nayak Mohalla, Ramgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
4. Bharat Singh S/o Phoolsingh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Sabji Mandi, Nayak Mohalla, Ramgarh District Alwar. (Raj.) (Presently The Accused Are In Judicial Custody In Central Jail Alwar) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakad, PP Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL (V.J.) Order 24/06/2025
1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioners under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.63/2025 registered at Police Station Ramgarh, District Alwar for offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 333, 3(5), 109(1) of B.N.S. and after investigation for the offences under Sections 115(2), 333, 189(2), 109(1), 3(5), 61(2), 117(2) of B.N.S.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in respect of one injury to the victim-Tulshiram; several accused have been implicated; co-accused namely Deepak Singh, Sabir @ Sabbi & Sagar Nayak @ Putin have already been released on bail
[2025:RJ-JP:23444] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7964/2025] by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court; petitioners are in custody since long; charge-sheet has been filed; conclusion of trial may take long time. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 5. Taking into consideration the totality of facts, including that that co-accused have been released on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court; charge-sheet has been filed; without commenting on merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release petitioner on bail. 4.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioners namely Tarun Urf Bhatti S/o Puranmal Saini, Gurudayal Urf Gaurav Urf Gutiyari S/o Birbal, Vasudev Nayak S/o Yadram Nayak & Bharat Singh S/o Phoolsingh shall be released on bail provided, they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. 5. In addition to above mentioned conditions, it is made clear that the petitioners shall not repeat the similar nature of offence during bail granted by this Court; shall not threaten the prosecution witness and shall not leave District Alwar without prior permission of concerned Trial court. In case of breach, same shall be the reason to cancel the bail by the Trial Court itself. (SUDESH BANSAL (V.J.)),J Upendra Pratap Singh /139