APHC010312982020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20697/2020 Between: 1. SMT. A. DURGA BRAHMINI,, W/O. A,VINOD KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCE. HOUSE WIFE, R/ O. 20-3-84, AMMISETTIVARI VEEDHI, BEHIND SIVALAYAM, SATTENAPALLI TOWN,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. AKUTHOTA VINOD KUMAR,, S/O. AKUTHOTA DURGA RAO AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC. SELF EMPLOYEMENT, R/O. 20-3-84, AMMISETTIVARI VEEDHI, BEHIND SIVALAYAM, SATTENAPALLI TOWN,GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY ( HOME DEPARTMENT), SECRETRIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR RURAL DISTRICT, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SATTENAPALLI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SATTENAPALLI TOWN POLICE STATION, SATTENAPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. ATUKURI NAGESWARA RAO, X( CHINNA BABU), S/O.NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.8-1-33, GANDHI CHOWK SATEENAPALLI TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. ATUKURI MOURYA, S/O.ATUKURI NAGESWARA RAO ( CHINNA BABU), AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.8-1- 33, GANDHI CHOWK SATEENAPALLI TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue writ, order or direcdtion more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 4 in not taking any action against the Respondents 5 and 6 who are interfering with the personal life and liberty of the Petitioner and their matrimonail life and also harrasing the Petitioners and also not taking any action aganist the Respondents 5 and 6 for their high handed and illegal acts towards the Petitioners and their matrimonial life and also not providing protection is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of article 14 and 21 of The Constitution of India and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to provide protection to the Petitioners as well as to their Matrimonial life pending disposal of the main writ petition before this Hon'ble court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MD SALEEM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. T S RAYALU The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20697 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 4 in not taking any action against the Respondents 5 and 6 who are interfering with the personal life and liberty of the Petitioner and their matrimonial life and also harassing the Petitioners and also not taking any action against the Respondents 5 and 6 for their high handed and illegal acts towards the Petitioners and their matrimonial life and also not providing protection is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of article 14 and 21 of The Constitution of India and pass…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents would submit that the respondent-Police are not calling the petitioners to the police station, except once i.e., only on the day of counseling. He further represented that it is a love marriage between the petitioners and they need protection from their parents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the above said submission, the Writ petition is disposed of. However, the Police are directed to attend the cause of the petitioners in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 18.08.2025. SRT HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.20697 of 2020 Dated.18.08.2025 SRT 136