APHC010312922023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3504/2023 Between: 1. NIMMALLA ADEMMA, W/O PENCHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, 2. SANNALA RAMA SUBBAMMA, W/O LATE SANNALA VENKATA KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, 3. SANGANA KOTESWARA RAO, S/O VENKATAIAH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, 4. MALLIREDDY VENKATAMMA, W/O BALARAM REDDY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, 5. NALLU PENCHALAMMA, W/O CHINNA PENCHALAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, 6. MARRIPALLI RAJANI, W/O SHANKARAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, 7. GUNJI SANTAMMA, W/O RATNAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE 8. MANDARAPU MASTANAMMA, W/O MOHAN AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE 9. NAZI OBULAMMA, W/O SESHAIAH AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE 10. GUNJI PENCHALAMMA, W/O VENKATESWARLU, AGE ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE 2 11. S.SRINIVASULU, GRANDSON OF MANDE RAMANAMMA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS OCC. AGRICULTURE, 12. SANNALA VENKATA RATNAMMA, W/O SUDHAKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, 13. PANTHAGIRI SRIDEVI, W/O GURRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE 14. KOTHAPALLI LAKSHMIDEVAMMA, W/O NARASAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE 15. VENIMIREDDY RAMANAMMA, W/O RAMANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, 16. DUGGIREDDY SUNITHA,, W/O RAVINDRA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE. R/O PULIKALLU (VIL.), PODALALCURU MANDAL, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT) ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR I A S, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 2. R KURMANATH I A S, THE SPECIAL COLLECTOR, (L.A.) TELUGU GANGA PROJECT, MULAPETA, NELLORE, 3. RAJA RAMESH PREM KUMAR MATANGI, THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, (L.A.), TELUGU GANGA PROJECT, RAPUR AT NELLORE, MULAPETA, NELLORE, S.P.S.R.NELLORE DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for flouting the order of the Honourable Court in W.P.No.10636 of 2019, dt.23-01-2023 by Honourable Sri Justice Ravi Cheemalapati, deliberately and intentionally and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to implement the order of the Honourable Court in W.P.No.10636 of 2019, dt.23-01-2023 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with personal appearance of the Petitioner / Respondent No.2 in CC No.3504/2023 in WP No. 10636/2019, dt.05.12.2024 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to discharge the Respondent No.2 in CC No.3504/2023 in WP No. 10636/2019 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CH C KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. S SIVA KUMARI 2. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 04.01.2023 passed in W.P.No.10427 of 2019. 2. Sri Ch.C.Krishna Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that as against the orders of this Court, disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt, the unofficial respondents have preferred writ appeals and the Division Bench of this Court has modified the order passed in 4 W.P.No.10636 of 2019 & batch wherein the subject writ petition is one among them. 3. Learned counsel for both the parties prayed to close the contempt. 4. Recording the said submissions, as the order, dated 04.01.2023 has been modified; the contempt case is liable to be closed. 5. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 17th July, 2025 RKS