[2025:RJ-JP:29805] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8090/2025 Amar Singh Alias Kallu Son Of Devisahai, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Village Karodi, Police Station Mehandipur Balaji,dis- trict Dausa, Rajasthan At Present Lodged In The Central Jail Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashvin Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 04/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.662/2024 registered at Police Station Ramnagariya, District Jaipur City (East) (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 140(3), 3(5), 308(2), 127(2) & 61(2)(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 127(2), 61(2)(a) & 140(2) of BNS and Section 3/25(1-B)(a) of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that co- accused namely Ravina, Hemant Kumar Meena & Saurabh Meena [2025:RJ-JP:29805] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8090/2025] have already been granted benefit of bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel contends that petitioner is in custody since 15.01.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that co-accused namely Ravina, Hemant Kumar Meena & Saurabh Meena have already been granted benefit of bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court; charge-sheet has been filed in this matter and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner -Amar Singh Alias Kallu Son Of Devisahai shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, [2025:RJ-JP:29805] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8090/2025] on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /239