Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22189 (CHH)

NARSINGH SINHA (J.C. 697395 L SUBEDAR RADIO GRAPHER) v. UNION OF INDIA

WPC/3144/2021 · 2025-04-02

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3144 of 2021 1 - Narsingh Sinha (J.C. 697395 L Subedar Radio Grapher) S/o Late Shri Jeewan Lal Sinha Aged About 50 Years R/o Village And Post- Nahanda, P.S.- Deori, Tahsil- Dondi Lohara, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh. Present Address- Military Hospital Wellington,post- Barax, District- Nilgiri, Tamilnadu., Tamil Nadu ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Union Of India Through Secretary Defense, New Delhi, Pin- 110011., District : New Delhi, Delhi 2 - General Officer Commanding In Chief Head Quarter Eastern Command New Delhi, C/o 99, Apo, Pin- 908542., District : New Delhi, Delhi 3 - General Officer Commanding In Chief Head Quarter Southern Command, Pin- 908541., District : New Delhi, Delhi 4 - Pay And Allowance Office (O.R) Coraps Of Army Medical Craps, Lucknow- 2, Pin- 900450., District : Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 5 - Smt. Veena Sinha W/o Narsingh Sinha Aged About 46 Years R/o A/52, Mukatagiri, Jeewan Colony, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. Pin- 491441., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Manikpuri, Advocate For Union of India : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Deputy Solicitor General Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 02.04.2025 1. Mr. Manikpuri, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has already taken back brief from his office and he has no instruction. 2. Mr. Mishra, the learned Deputy Government Advocate appearing for the respondents No.1 to 4 would submit that the petitioner has a remedy to challenge the order impugned before the Armed Forces Tribunal and this petition is not maintainable. REKHA SINGH Digitally signed by REKHA SINGH -2- 3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 4. Taking into consideration the submissions made by the respective parties, this petition is dismissed. However the petitioner would be at liberty to avail remedy as available under the law. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha