KARNATAKA SLUM DEVELOPMENT BOARD v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/19660/2013 · 2025-01-10
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22188 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22188 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1023 WP No. 19660 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 19660 OF 2013 (GM-SLUM) BETWEEN:
KARNATAKA SLUM DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO.55, "ABHAYA COMPLEX" RISALDAR ROAD, SESHADRIPURAM, BANGALORE-560 020. REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER. SRI. B.RAJANNA., AGE 55 YEARS. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRIKANTH.M.P., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOUSING DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DISTRICT, BANGALORE. 3. SMT. N.MALINI W/O SRI M.H.MOTIGI, AGED MAJOR, BANGALORE CITY,
4. SMT.RAJESWARI W/O SRI S.T.PARAMESHWARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, BANGALORE CITY,
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1023 WP No. 19660 of 2013
5. SMT. MANJULA W/O LATE T.P.NATARAJ, AGED MAJOR,
RESPONDENTS NO.3-5 ARE RESIDING AT NO. 200, SRI MANJUNATHA NIVAS, 18TH MAIN ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA. BANGALORE-560 095. 6. SRI VEERABASAVAIAH S/O LATE T.V.HANUMANTHARAJU, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
7. SRI DODDANANJUNDAPPA @ VIJAYA S/O LATE T.V.HANUMANTHARAJU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
RESPONDENTS NO.6 AND 7 ARE RESIDING AT KURUBARA BEEDI, THYAMAGONDLU, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT-560 062. 8. SMT. N.S.AHALYAMBIKE, W/O LATE PROF. D.RANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, SANJEEVA NAGARA, BANNERGHATTA, MAIN ROAD, KALKERE-POST, BENGALURU-560 083. 9. SRI. MANJUNATH NILIGIRI.N.
S/O LATE H.M.NANJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, NO. SF 28, 2ND FLOOR, HAMEED SHAH COMPLEX, COBBONPET MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 002. …RESPONDENTS
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1023 WP No. 19660 of 2013
(BY SRI. MANJUNATHA SHETTAR., AGA FOR R1 & 2;
SRI. M.H.MOTIGI., ADVOCATE FOR R6 & 7;
SRI. A.R.K.USMANI.,ADVOCATE FOR R8 & 9;
V/O DATED:25.10.2024 R3-N.NALINI; R4-RAJESHWARI; R5-MANJULA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 07.01.2025, on that day, though matter called twice, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner it was ordered to be listed on 10.01.2025.
The petition is listed today for appearance of counsel for the petitioner. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner
- 4 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1023 WP No. 19660 of 2013
is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19