ARSHAD KHAN @ BENDA S/O BABLU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/7889/2025 · 2025-08-07
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22186 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22186 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:30393] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7889/2025
1. Arshad Khan @ Benda S/o Bablu, Aged About 22 Years, R/o House No. 94 Akbar Road Behind Fakiron Ki Masjid Kotri Kota P.s. Gumanpura District Kota.
2. Moinuddin @ Moin S/o Munna Khan, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Behind Fakiron Ki Masjid Kotri Kota P.s. Gu- manpura District Kota.
3. Tarik Husain @ Ashu S/o Mansoor Husain, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Behind Fakiron Ki Masjid Kotri Kota P.s. Gu- manpura District Kota. (At Present Confined At District Jail Kota) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 07/08/2025
1. This instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS., on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.251/2025 registered at Police Station Gumanpura, District Kota City (Raj.) for the offence punishable under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2) & 110 of BNS.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case.
Learned counsel submit that all the injuries sustained to injured person are simple in nature. Petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest & trial of the case will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose.
[2025:RJ-JP:30393] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7889/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by
learned counsel for the petitioners.
4. I have considered the contentions.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners as also considering the nature of injuries; trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail applications.
6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1) Arshad Khan @ Benda S/o Bablu, 2) Moinuddin @ Moin S/o Munna Khan & 3) Tarik Husain @ Ashu S/o Mansoor Husain shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /159