MD FAYAZ ANSARI ALIAS MD FAYAZ ALIAS MD FAIYAZ ANSARI ALLIAS MD,FAIYAZ v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./4392/2025 · 2025-08-13
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22186 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22186 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:23598
--1-- A.B.A. No. 4392 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 4392 of 2025
---- Md. Fayaz Ansari @ Faiyaz Ansari @ Md. Fayaz @ Md. Faiyaz, aged about 28 years, son of Md. Khair Ansari, resident of village – Bihari (Gokhna), PO – Kedali, PS – Hunterganj, District – Chatra, Jharkhand
.... Petitioner -- Versus --
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Victim, aged about xx years, wife of xxxx, presently residing at village xxxx, PO and PS – xxxx, District xxxx, Jharkhand, permanent resident of xxxx, PO and PS – xxxx, District – xxxx, Jharkhand
.... Opposite Parties
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner :- Mr. Amit Kr. Verma, Advocate
For the State
:- Ms. Amrita Kumari, Advocate
---- 03/13.08.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hunterganj P.S. Case No.125 of 2024 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 376 and 506 of Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chatra.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is happened to be the brother-in-law of the victim. He submits that false allegation is made against the petitioner and in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the
2025:JHHC:23598
--2-- A.B.A. No. 4392 of 2025
petitioner.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that in the case diary the materials are there against the petitioner and the victim has also supported the case in her statement made under Sections 161 and 164 of Cr.P.C. She submits in view of that the anticipatory bail may not be granted.
5. Considering that there is direct allegation against the petitioner of rape on the point of knife that too upon his sister-in- law (Bhabhi).
6. In the attending facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Sangam/