RAMANDEEP SINGH ALIAS RAMANDEEP SINGH SANDHU ALIAS RAMNA BABA v. STATE OF PUNJAB
CRM-M/7109/2025 · 2025-03-20
Sanjiv Berry
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22185 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22185 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
226
CRM-M-7109-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-7109-2025 Date of decision: 20.03.2025
RAMANDEEP SINGH ALIAS RAMANDEEP SINGH SIDHU ALIAS RAMNA BABA ….Petitioner
Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ....Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- Mr. Balraj Singh, Advocate for Mr. Nirmaljeet Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ankit Grewal, DAG Punjab. ..… SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition filed under Section 482 BNSS, 2023, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR (Annexure P-1) as under: - FIR No. Dated Sections Police Station 54 11.06.2022 458, 323, 427, 34 IPC (Section 325 added later on) Phool, District Bathinda
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in compliance to the order dated 11.03.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioner has appeared before the learned Trial Court and furnished his requisite bail bonds/surety bonds. He has placed on record copy of the Puneet Sharma 2025.03.24 12:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
226
CRM-M-7109-2025 -2-
order dated 12.03.2025 whereby the petitioner has been admitted on interim bail by the learned Trial Court.
3. Learned State counsel has not disputed the aforesaid factum.
4. Heard.
5. During the course of hearing on 11.03.2025 following order had been passed: -
“ Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Gian Chand, has submitted that the challan against the petitioner has already been presented before the Court of learned Illaqa Magistrate, Phul at Bathinda.
2. Be it the case, the petitioner is directed to appear before the learned trial Court on or before 13.03.2025 and in that event, he is ordered to be released on interim bail on his furnishing personal/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court/Judge on duty.
3. List on 20.03.2025.
4. Investigating Officer of the case to remain present along with record on the next date of hearing.”
6. Keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has already appeared in the Court and furnished his requisite bail/surety bonds consequent to the order dated 11.03.2025, passed by this Court, interim bail granted vide order dated 11.03.2025 is hereby confirmed, subject to conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS.
7.
Disposed of.
(SANJIV BERRY) 20.03.2025 JUDGE puneet i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Puneet Sharma 2025.03.24 12:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
226
CRM-M-7109-2025 -3- Puneet Sharma 2025.03.24 12:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment