APHC010312582021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18703/2021 Between: 1. DONGA SRINU, S/O DONGA DURGA RAO, AGED 35 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O MTYALAPALLI, MOGALTUR (M), WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. DONGA RAMAKRISHNA, S/O DONGA DURGA RAO, AGED 33 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O MTYALAPALLI, MOGALTUR (M), WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. MAMIDISETTY KANAKA MAHALAKSHMI, W/O. UMASHENKARA SRINIVAS, AGED 39 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O TDERU, BHIMAVARAM (M) , WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. MAMIDISETTY JAYA VENKATA PRASAD, S/O UMASHENKARA SRINIVAS, AGED 20 YEARS, STUDENT , R/O TDERU, BHIMAVARAM (M) , WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. RATNALA SAI, S/O RATNALA SRINIVAS, AGED 21 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O TDERU, BHIMAVARAM (M) , WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPALE SCRETARY (HOME) SECRETRIATE BUILDING, SECRETRIATE, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPRINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI,AT ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, I TOWN POLICE STATION, BHIMAVARAM, BHIMAVARAM , WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. SRI VENKATESWARA RAO, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BHIMAVARAM I TOWN PS., BHIMAVARAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K L N SWAMY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the Respondents particularly Res. Nos.3rd /4th is illegal arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful living of the petitioners without committing any criminal offence and further direct the 2nd respondent to initiate enquiry against the 3rd/4th respondent for causing bleeding injuries by manhandling illegally in the police station.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri K.L.N.Swamy, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that no further orders are required in this matter as the relief sought in this petition has become infructuous. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as the relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:16.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.18703 of 2021 Dt.16.09.2025 Dinesh