RITESH @ DEEPAK S/O SURESH KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/7820/2025 · 2025-06-20
Maneesh Sharma V J
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22184 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22184 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:23375] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7820/2025 Ritesh @ Deepak S/o Suresh Kumar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Badijodi, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur (Accused Petitioner At Present Confined In District Jail Kotputli- Behror) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7858/2025 Sonu S/o Omprakash, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Ward No. 26, Devan Road, Shahpura, Police Station Shahpura, District Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kotputli) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shiv Kumar Tyagi Mr. Himanshu with Mr. Vikash Kumar Jakhar For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG Mr. Vivek Sharma, AGA Mr. G.D. Bansal Mr. Dharmendra Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.)
Order 20/06/2025
1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (B.N.S.S.) on behalf of the petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.195/2025 registered at Police Station Shahpura (Jaipur Rural), District Jaipur Rural for the offence(s)
[2025:RJ-JP:23375] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7820/2025] under Sections 318(2) & 318(4) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (B.N.S.) and Sections 63 & 65 of the Copyright Act, 1957.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He submits that the petitioners have purchased the alleged recovered goods on 30.05.2025 from Yash General Store, who is an authorized dealer of Maheshwari Tea Company; the offences are triable by Magistrate; the petitioners are in judicial custody since 04.06.2025; and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant vehemently oppose the bail applications and submit that looking to the rampant in peace of such incident, bail should not be granted to the petitioners.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the fact that the petitioners have purchased the alleged recovered goods on 30.05.2025 from Yash General Store, who is an authorized dealer of Maheshwari Tea Company; considering the fact that the offences are triable by Magistrate; the petitioners are in judicial custody since 04.06.2025; and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without commenting any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.
6. Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that the accused- petitioners- (1) Ritesh @ Deepak S/o Suresh Kumar & (2) Sonu S/o Omprakash, shall be enlarged on bail provided both of
[2025:RJ-JP:23375] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7820/2025] them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. The petitioners shall not tamper with any evidence nor would influence the witnesses in the case.
8. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the Trial Court to cancel this bail granted to them by this Court.
(MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.)),J DEEPA RANI-61-62