Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22183 (KAR)

SMT KAMALAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/3785/2022 · 2025-02-14

M G S Kamal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6717 WP No. 3785 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3785 OF 2022 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN: 1. SMT KAMALAMMA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, W/O LATE M.H.SRIRAMAIAH 2. SRI.ANJANAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O LATE M.H.SRIRAMAIAH. 3. SRI.S.ASHOK AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, S/O LATE M.H.SRIRAMAIAH 4. SRI.NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, S/O LATE M.H.SRIRAMAIAH ALL ARE R/AT BENGALURU CITY H.NO.57/1, ANJANADRI NILAYA, FIRST D CROSS ROAD, MATHIKERE, BENGALURU-560 054. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KASHINATH J.D.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001. REP BY ITS SECRETARY Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6717 WP No. 3785 of 2022 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 020 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B. SUKANYA BALIGA AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHN.,ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.01.1977 AT ANNEXURE-B ISSUED BY THE R2 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 02.08.1978 AT ANNEXURE-C ISSUED BY THE R1 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED ARE LAPSED AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6717 WP No. 3785 of 2022 ORAL ORDER Sri. Kashinath J.D., learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo dated 14.02.2025 seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition as not pressed. 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the above, petition is dismissed as not pressed. SD/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE RL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30