[2025:RJ-JP:34287] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3764/2025 Deep Singh Son of Shri Sitaram, Aged About 56 Years, Resident of Vijay Mandir Road, Khanij Bhawan Ke Paas, Shikari Bas, Police Station Shivaji Park, Alwar, Rajasthan, Mo. No. 9636979813 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Khema Devi Wife of Late Shri Manohar Singh, Resident of Khanij Bhawan Ke Pass, Shikari Bas, Alwar, Rajasthan. 3. Chhaju Singh Son of Late Shri Manohar Singh, Resident of Khanij Bhawan Ke Pass, Shikari Bas, Alwar, Rajasthan. 4. Mahendra Singh Son of Shri Charan Singh, Resident of Dalmiya Dairy, Rampura, Police Station Sewar, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 5. Hukam Singh Son of Shri Charan Singh, Resident of Buddh Vihar, Kachchi Basti, Birai Mata Ke Paas, Alwar, Rajasthan. 6. Manju Devi Wife of Shri Uday Singh, Resident of Khanij Bhawan Ke Pass, Shikari Bas, Alwar, Rajasthan. 7. Puja Devi Wife of Shri Chhaju Singh, Resident of Khanij Bhawan Ke Pass, Shivaji Park, Alwar, Rajasthan. 8. Uday Singh Son of Shri Baldev Singh, Resident of Khanij Bhawan Ke Pass, Shikari Bas, Alwar, Rajasthan. 9. Mohan Singh Son of Shri Sohan Singh, Resident of Kharbas, Kachchi Basti, Alwar, Rajasthan. 10. Dharm Singh Meena, Thana Adhikari, Police Station Shivaji Park, Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Chandra Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 28/08/2025 1. Petitioner is complainant and feeling aggrieved by dismissal of Criminal Complaint Case No. 22/35/2016 titled Deep Singh Vs. Khema Devi by the Additional Judicial Magistrate No. 4, Alwar vide order dated 18.07.2022 as also feeling aggrieved by order dated 24.04.2025 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge No.1 [2025:RJ-JP:34287] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3764/2025] Alwar, dismissing Revision Petition filed by the petitioner and thereagainst, instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023. 2. It appears that petitioner lodged a criminal complaint way back in the year 2016, levelling allegations that the accused persons are harassing the petitioner to grab his ancestral property and respondent No. 9, a Police personnel is supporting the accused persons. 3. On such criminal complaint, statements of complainant and his witnesses were recorded by the Judicial Magistrate. Thereafter, on appreciation of the evidence produced by the petitioner in support of allegations made in the criminal complaint, the Judicial Magistrate did not find occurrence of any cognizable/ non- cognizable offence and dismissed the complaint vide order dated 18.07.2022. Petitioner filed Criminal Revision Petition against order dated 18.07.2022, which has been considered on merits and dismissed vide order dated 24.04.2025. 4. Counsel for petitioner, after arguing for some time and in view of concurrent fact findings of both Courts as also the fact that the present petition is virtually a second criminal revision petition in the guise of filing criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, does not want to press the petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /3