Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22181 (AP)

Pigilam Jayalakshmi, v. Kota Naveena

CRP/958/2021 · 2025-07-17

T C D Sekhar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010312472021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 958/2021 Between: 1. PIGILAM JAYALAKSHMI,, W/O LATE SURESH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, 2. PIGILAM SAI SUMANTH, S/O LATE SURESH, AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS,OCC. STUDENT, 3. PIGILAM SAI SRIKAR,, S/O LATE SURESH, AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS,OCC. STUDENT, PETITIONERS 2 AND 3 ARE BEING MINORS REPRESENTED THEIR MOTHER, NATURAL GUARDIAN P.SAYALAKSHMI, THE LST PETITIONER. ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE PRESENTLY RESIDENTS OF AN.O. 11-411, OPP.HOUSE OF KATTALA DEPOT, ASHOK NAGAR, GUDUR TOWN, S.P.S.R.NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. KOTA NAVEENA, w/o Venkateswarlu, Aged about 29 years, Om. Housewife, R/o 3rd line, Ranipet, Gudur Town, S.P.S.R.Nellore District ...RESPONDENT 2 TCDS,J C.R.P.NO.958 OF 2021 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toto present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition to this Hon'ble Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, aggrieved by the decree and order dt.23-07-2021 passed in I.A.No.200 of 2019 in O.S.No.179 of 2016 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Gudur, S.P.S.R. Nellore District IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay of all further proceedings including trial in 0.S.No.179 of 2016 on the file of the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Gudur, S.P.S.R.Nellore District, pending disposal of the C.R.P and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CH C KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. I BALA SUBRAHMANYAM The Court made the following: 3 TCDS,J C.R.P.NO.958 OF 2021 ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause in the present civil revision petition does not survive. 2. The said submission is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR 18.07.2025 LSP 4 TCDS,J C.R.P.NO.958 OF 2021 136 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 958/2021 18.07.2025 LSP