Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22179 (GAU)

SITHI NATH AND 5 ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/6907/2024 · 2025-04-27

Suman Shyam

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010274102024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6907/2024 SITHI NATH AND 5 ORS W/O- CHIRANJIB DAS, R/O- MEHARPUR, SREE DURGA SARANI DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM 2: DIPA CHAKRABORTY W/O- PABITRA BANERJEE R/O- KALINAGAR PART-III DISTRICT- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 3: SATI RANI MALAKAR W/O- BINANDAN MALAKAR R/O- POLAPAR DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM 4: SHUKLA NATH W/O- SAJAL NATH R/O- UTTAR KRISHNAPUR PART-III DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM 5: MALLIKA RANI DAS W/O- SUDIP PAUL R/O- VIVEKANANDA ROAD DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM 6: ITI NATH D/O- LATE JATINDRA NATH R/O- KAJIDAHAR PART-III DIST.- CACHAR ASSA Page No.# 2/3 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 4:THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES (FAMILY WELFARE) SWASTHYA BHAWAN GUWAHATI-36 5:THE MISSION DIRECTOR NATIONAL HEALTH MISSION ASSAM CHRISTIANBASTI GUWAHATI- Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J LASKAR, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HEALTH AND F W, SC, FINANCE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER Date : 28-04-2025 Mr. J. Laskar, learned counsel for the writ petitioners submits that the selection process in question has already been concluded but the writ petitioner was not allowed to participate in the same. Therefore, at this point of time, no live issue survives for adjudication in this writ petition. Mr. D. Upamanu, learned standing counsel, Health Department, Assam is present Page No.# 3/3 and supports the said contention. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant