A No. 5056 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 31-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA A No. 5056 of 2025 in C.S.No.873 of 2016 1. K.Vijayakumari No.42/178, Mannar Koil St. Royapuram, Chennai-13. Applicant(s) Vs 1. K.Subramanian No.29/15, Subedar Hussain Street, Royapettah, Chennai 600 014. Respondent(s) PRAYER: Application is filed to direct the Respondent/Defendant to deliver the Interrogatories to this Court, the list of which is more fully set out in the Petition hereunder. For Applicant(s): M/S R.V GAYATHIRI FOR M/S.P.B. Ramanujam For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Vijay https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 5056 of 2025 ORDER This application has been filed by the plaintiff to direct the respondent / defendant to deliver the interrogatories and also to furnish the certified documents. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that D.W.1 has produced certain documents only after he get into the box during trial and hence it necessitated the applicant / plaintiff to file this application to deliver those interrogatories. 3. The learned counsel for the respondent / defendant submitted that those interrogatories are unnecessary because the plaintiff is always at liberty to cross- examine the defendant who is in the box with regard to the details for which interrogatories are sought to be delivered. He further submitted that D.W.1 is a senior citizen and hence his cross-examination has to be completed without making any further delay. He further submitted that in the very same application an another relief of producing documents is also sought and for which the applicant is expected to file a separate application. 4. The anxiety of the applicant / plaintiff is that the documents now sought to be marked on the side of the defendant has exposed lot of doubts and about which clarifications are needed. In this connection, the defendant is required to produce certain documents and only with the above details, the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 5056 of 2025 cross-examination can be effectively done. So far as the production of documents is concerned, the applicant / plaintiff is at liberty to furnish a notice to produce the documents even before proceeding to cross-examine him. With regard to the interrogatories, I feel the delivery is not required as the applicant / plaintiff can very well cross-examine the defendant after getting the documents furnished by the defendant in pursuant to the notice, if any, given in this regard and cross-examine on those aspects. 5. With the above observations, this Application is disposed. 31-10-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No bkn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 5056 of 2025 R.N.MANJULA J. bkn A No. 5056 of 2025 31-10-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis