Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22177 (GAU)

SAURAV KALITA AND 3 ORS v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS

WP(C)/6961/2024 · 2025-01-05

Michael Zothankhuma

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010274072024 2025:GAU-AS:80 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6961/2024 SAURAV KALITA AND 3 ORS S/O LATE SIDDHARTA KALITA, R/O RANGIA TWN, WARD NO. 7, P.O. AND P.S.-RANGIA, DIST- KAMRUP (R), ASSAM 2: SMTI JYOTISIKHA KALITA W/O LATE SIDDHARTHA KALITA R/O RANGIA TWN WARD NO. 7 P.O. AND P.S.-RANGIA DIST- KAMRUP (R) ASSAM 3: SUBHAM KALITA S/O LATE SIDDHARTHA KALITA R/O RANGIA TWN WARD NO. 7 P.O. AND P.S.-RANGIA DIST- KAMRUP (R) ASSAM (BEING MINOR REPRESENTED BYHIS MOTHER SMTI JYOTISIKHA KALITA (PET. NO. 2)) 4: TRISHUL KALITA S/O LATE SIDDHARTHA KALITA R/O RANGIA TWN WARD NO. 7 P.O. AND P.S.-RANGIA DIST- KAMRUP (R) ASSAM (BEING MINOR REPRESENTED BYHIS MOTHER SMTI JYOTISIKHA KALITA (PET. NO. 2) VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, Page No.# 2/3 MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, NEW DELHI, INDIA 2:THE NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAYS REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER RAILWAY HEADQUARTER MALIGAON GUWAHATI-11 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 3:THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER RANGIA RAILWAY DIVISION RANGIA KAMRUP (R) ASSAM 4:THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL ENGINEER (CO ORDINATION) RANGIA RAILWAY DIVISION RANGIA KAMRUP (R) ASSAM 5:THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER RANGIA RAILWAY DIVISION-II RANGIA KAMRUP (R) ASSAM 6:THE ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER NEW BONGAIGAON BONGAIGAON ASSAM 7:THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL FINANCE MANAGER RANGIA RAILWAY DIVISION ASSAM 8:THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL AUDIT OFFICER RANGIA RAILWAY DIVISION ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S BORA, N J LOUCU,MR. P CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA ORDER 06.01.2025 Mr. S. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh by deleting the name of the petitioner Nos.2-4. Ms. B. Sarma, learned CGC appears for the respondents. The prayer of the petitioners’ counsel is allowed. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant