w APHC010312652025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15792 OF 2025 Between: Poddutoori Laxma Reddy, S/o Poddutoori Malla Reddy, Aged about 75 years R/o. H.No. 6-3-653, Kisan Nagar, Karimnagar, Telangana. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, A.P. 2. The Superintendent of Police, At Narasaraopet, Palnadu District Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sattenapalli, Palnadu District. 4. The Inspector of Police/Station House Officer, Sattenapalli Town Police Station, Sattenapalli, Palnadu District, Andhra Pradesh. 5. Vemula Prasad, S/o. Vemula Sriramulu, R/o D.S. Nagar, Yetukuru Road, Guntur City, Guntur District. 6. Kompalli Madhu, S/o.KompalliMallakondaiah, R/o D.S. Nagar, Yetukuru Road, Guntur City, Guntur District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of the Respondents Respondents No. 3 and 4 in calling the petitioner to the police station and to especially the coerce or compel the petitioner to settle the civil dispute arising out of the Sale Agreement, dated 20.04.2015 entered into by the Respondents No. 5 and 6 with the Petitioners son, i ■e., Podduturi Janardhan Reddy as illegal, arbitrary the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 4 not to interfere with in the civil dispute and not to call the petitioner to the police station. and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of lA NO: 1 OF 2n9R Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 3 and 4 not to call the and compelling him to settle petitioner to the police station a civil dispute with Respondent No. 5 and 6, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHAIK ASIF Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5 & 6: The Court made the following order: to 4: GP FOR HOME APHC010312652025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15792/2025 Between: 1.PODDUTOORI LAXMA REDDY, S/0 PODDUTOORI MALTA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/0. H.NO. 6-3-653, KISAN NAGAR, KARIMNAGAR, TELANGANA. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AT NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 3.THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SATTENAPALLI. PALNADU DISTRICT. 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE/STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SATTENAPALLI TOWN POLICE STATION, SATTENAPALLI, PALNADU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5.VEMULA PRASAD, S/0. VEMULA SRIRAMULU, R/0 D.S. NAGAR, YETUKURU ROAD, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR 2 DISTRICT. 6.K0MPALLI MADHU, S/0. KOMPALLIMALLAKONDAIAH D.S. NAGAR, YETUKURU ROAD, GUNTUR CITY DISTRICT. R/0 GUNTUR ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of the or o Respondents especially the Respondents No. 3 and 4 in calling the petitioner to the police satiation and to coerce or compel the petitioner to settle the civil dispute arising out of the Sale Agreement, dated 20.04 2015 into by the Respondents No. 5 and 6 with the Petitioners son, i.e. odduturi Janardhan Reddy as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently irect the Respondents 2 to 4 not to interfere with in the civil dispute and not to call the petitioner to the police station entered and pass lA NO: 1 OF Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents 3 and 4not to call the petitioner to the police station and compelling him to settle a civil dispute with Respondent No. 5 and 6, pending disposal of the writ petition, and pass such other order or orders are deemed fit and proper, and Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SHAIK ASIF Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GPFOR HOME as pass 3 The Court made the following order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was repeatedly called to the police station at the behest of respondents 5 & 6 and was being insisted to settle the civil dispute between the petitioner, petitioner’s son and the respondents 5 & 6. It is submitted that an agreement of sale was executed by the petitioner’s son on 20.04.2016 with the respondents 5 & 6 and that on account of certain differences between the petitioner’s son and the respondents 5 & 6, the same could not be materialized. The 2. respondent is now disturbing the peace of the petitioner and insisting the petitioner to settle the dispute with the respondents 5 & 6. 3. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the th petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the 4 respondent not to disturb the peace of the petitioner without following due process of law. It is made clear that the 4*'^ respondent shall not interfere in civil disputes pending between the petitioner, petitioner’s son and the respondents 5 & 6. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. SOI- N. NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 0-^ SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, A.P. 2. The Superintendent of Police, At Narasaraopet, Palnadu District Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sattenapalli, Palnadu District. 4. The Inspector of Police/Station House Officer, Sattenapalli Town Police Station, Sattenapalli, Palnadu District, Andhra Pradesh. 5. One CC to Sri Shaik Asif Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies TF % HIGH COURT DATED:30/06/2025 ORDER WP NO. 15792 OF 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P., WITHOUT COSTS