[2025:RJ-JP:29022] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1632/2025 Vasudev @ Alok S/o Pushpendra, R/o Shandilyapada Mandrayal Ps Mandrayal District Karauli (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In District Jail Karauli District Karauli) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP 2. Shri Ashok S/o Ananda, Aged About 36 Years, Nprasad P.s. Mandrayal District Karauli ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Anupam Sharma For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP Mr. Hari Krishana Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 30/07/2025 1. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14A SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act being aggrieved of the order dated 10.06.2025 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Karauli, District Karauli in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.67/2025, CIS No.67/2025 rejecting the bail application preferred on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.70/2025 registered at Police Station Mandrail, District Karauli (Rajasthan) for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 352 & 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023 and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) & 3(2) (va) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (Amendment 2015). [2025:RJ-JP:29022] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-1632/2025] 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the appellant that appellant has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that though there is allegation against the appellant of using firearm but none of the persons have sustained firearm injury. It is contended that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel further submits that appellant is in custody since 26.05.2025 and further custody of the appellant would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the prayer of bail made in this appeal. 4. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned counsel for the complainant and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, as also the material available on record as well as looking to the custody period, but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of this case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the appellant on bail. 6. Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 10.06.2025 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Karauli, District Karauli in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.67/2025, CIS No.67/2025 is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant- Vasudev @ Alok S/o Pushpendra arrested in connection with FIR No.70/2025 registered at Police Station Mandrail, District Karauli (Rajasthan), [2025:RJ-JP:29022] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-1632/2025] shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant appeal (bail) and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /398