IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.138 of 2025 Date of Decision: 27.08.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Dr. Krishan Chand Malhotra and Another ……...Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Others …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Mr. S.P. Chatterji, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for State. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) By way of instant execution petition, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioners for execution and implementation of judgment dated 28.06.2021, passed by this Court in CWP No.1209 of 2020, whereby this Court passed the following order: “3. Consequently, in view of above, present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the case of the petitioners, in light of the judgment (supra), expeditiously, preferably within four weeks. Needless to say, respondents shall afford opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and shall pass a speaking order thereafter. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate court, if they still remain aggrieved.” 2. Since no action, whatsoever, came to be taken at the behest of the respondents pursuant to aforesaid direction, petitioners have approached this Court in the instant proceedings. 2 3. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, while putting in appearance on behalf of the respondents, states that though he has every reason to presume and believe that by now, order/judgment sought to be executed, must have been complied with in its totality, but if not, same would be definitely complied with within a period of two weeks from today. 4. Consequently, in view of fair stand adopted by the learned Additional Advocate General, this Court sees no reason to keep present petition alive and accordingly, same is disposed of with direction to the respondents to do the needful in terms of judgment sought to be executed, within a period of two weeks, failing which petitioners would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards the implementation of the order/judgment. August 27, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge