Vuyyuru Durga Prasad v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/6473/2025 · 2025-06-29
Harinath N
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22170 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22170 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010312862025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6473/2025 Between:
1. VUYYURU DURGA PRASAD, S/O. LATE NIRANJAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO 103, A BLOCK, DEFENSE OFFICERS FLATS, 0PP. TO VUDA PARK. EAST POINT COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH, PRESENTLY RESIDING IN LAW COLLEGE ROAD, YENDADA, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH SHO, ATCHUTAPURAM P.S. REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATI, NELAPADU, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. PILLA BHOGALINGESWARA RAO, S/O. LATE NAIDU, D.NO 18-38, NORTH EXTENSION LAYOUT,
SEETHAMMA DHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH.
(DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT)
3. VUYYURU KRANTHI KUMARI, W/O. VUYYURU DURGA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO 103, A BLOCK, DEFENSE OFFICERS FLATS, 0PP. TO VUDA PARK. EAST POINT COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH, PRESENTLY RESIDING IN LAW COLLEGE ROAD, YENDADA, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):
2
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. YENNAM SUDHEER BABU Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:
3
Order:
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is arraigned as Accused No.1 in Crime No.65 of 2025 on the file of Atchutapuram Police Station, Visakhapatnam District. It is submitted that the petitioner and the 2nd respondent are involved in certain civil disputes and financial transactions. The 2nd respondent lodged a complaint alleging the offence under Section 420 of the IPC. It is further submitted that, though the police issued a notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS, the petitioner was illegally confined at the police station for four days.
3. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the police have issued a notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS and that the investigation is in progress.
4. Recording the submissions of the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Petition is disposed of with a direction to the police to strictly comply with the provisions of Section 35(3) of the BNSS and not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner without following the due process of law.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 30.06.2025 PNS
4