Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22169 (CHH)

CHANDNI PRASAD GUPTA v. BUDHPRIYA BORKAR

MCC/509/2025 · 2025-06-12

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:23733 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 509 of 2025 1. Chandni Prasad Gupta, S/o Ramprasad Gupta, Aged About 74 Years, R/o Halwai Line, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 2. Maya Prasad Gupta, S/o Ramprasad Gupta, Aged About 72 Years, R/o Halwai Line, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 3. Bhavesh Gosai, S/o Krishna Rao Gosai, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Tulsipur Ward No.16, Tahsil & District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 4. Vinay Jha, S/o Ganesh Prasad Jha, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Baldeobagh, Ward No. 14, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicants versus 1. Budhpriya Borkar, S/o M.L. Borker, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Kourinbhat, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, At Present R/o Deputy Manager, Hindustan Copper Project, Malajkhand, District Balaghat, Madhya Pradesh, Through Power Of Attorney Sanghpriya Borker, S/o M.L. Borker, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Kourinbhat, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh (Plaintiff). 2. Bhuvan Das, S/o Late Baliram, R/o Village Dharmapur, Tahsil And District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh (Defendants). 3. Duleshwar, S/o Baliram, R/o Village Dharmapur, Tahsil And District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh (Defendants). 4. Ashok Sahu, Ph. No. 36, Karouinbhata, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 5. Ghanshyam Savank, Revenue Inspector, Kourinbhat, Rajnandgaon. 6. The State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, District Office, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Applicants : Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate. For State/respondent No.6 : Mr. Rajeev Bharat, G.A. DEEPTI JHA NIRALA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA NIRALA 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order On Board 13/06/2025 1. Heard on M.C.C., application for restoration of MA No.74/2019, which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 01.05.2025 2. Learned counsel for the applicants would submit that he was not well, therefore, he could not appear, when the case was called out for hearing. Hence, it is prayed that instant M.C.C. may be allowed and MA No.74/2019 may be restored to its original number. 3. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the application, instant M.C.C. is allowed, subject to deposit the cost of Rs.500/- in the account of High Court Legal Aid Committee, which shall be paid within a week. 4. Thereafter, Registry is directed to restore MA No.74/2019 {Chandi Prasad Gupta & Ors, Versus Budhpriya Borkar & Ors.} in its original number. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge