ISRAVEL v. The State rep by The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/30311/2025 · 2025-11-06
K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 221673 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 221673 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.30311 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 06.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.30311 of 2025 Isravel
... Petitioner Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police, K6, T.P.Chathiram Police Station, Chennai. (Crime No.207 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.207 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.Anandraj For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ******** 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.30311 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 11.08.2025, for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 190, 191(2) and 191(3) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.207 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.
2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner and his father was murdered by the deceased in this case, enraged over the same, he awaited for an opportunity and while the deceased was in the shop, he along with other accused went there and attacked the deceased indiscriminately, due to which, deceased sustained grievous injuries and died on the spot. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner has been incarcerated for more than 93 days and major part of the investigation has been completed. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that it is a case of retaliatory murder and 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.30311 of 2025 petitioner has two previous cases pending against him and further submitted that the investigation is pending.
5. Considering the motive behind the occurrence and the fact that it is a case of retaliatory murder and, if the petitioner is released on bail, there is a likelihood that the petitioner will hamper the trial process, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 06.11.2025 rna To 1.The Inspector of Police, K6, T.P.Chathiram Police Station, Chennai. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.30311 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR, J. rna Crl.O.P.No.30311 of 2025 06.11.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis