Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22167 (KAR)

SRI GOPALAKRISHNA H v. SMT CHAITHRA B N

CCC/406/2024 · 2025-01-22

M I Arun

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2648-DB CCC No. 406 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 406 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI GOPALAKRISHNA H S/O H HANUMAIAH AGED 56 YEARS R/AT NO.K-50A, MARUTHI NILAYA, 13TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN ROAD, LAKSHMINARAYANAPURAM BANGALORE - 560 021 …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. PRAKASH M.H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. CHAITHRA B.N. AGE: MAJOR R/AT NO.1739, 8TH BLOCK NEAR BHARATH PETROL BUNK, SIR M VISHVESHWARAIAH LAYOUT BANGALORE - 560 091 2. SRI K B NARAYANA AGE: MAJOR R/AT No.1739, 8TH BLOCK NEAR BHARATH PETROL BUNK, Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2648-DB CCC No. 406 of 2024 SIR M VISHVESHWARAIAH LAYOUT BANGALORE - 560 091 …ACCUSED (BY SRI. IRISHAD AHMED B M, ADVOCATE) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO INITIATE NECESSARY ACTION AGAINST THE ACCUSED IN RESPECT OF THE DISOBEDIENCE OF THE SPECIFIC DIRECTION DATED 05.01.2024 PASSED IN WRIT PETITION NO.19707 OF 2023 (BDA) VIDE ANNEXURE-E IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) The order brought under the contempt jurisdiction by filing this petition is admittedly an interim order passed in the pending writ proceedings and the subject matter thereof is pending at large on merits to be considered by learned Single Judge. By the very - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2648-DB CCC No. 406 of 2024 nature of the order, the rights of the parties are not finally crystallized. 2. In that view, the Court is not inclined to invoke the jurisdiction under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, leaving the complainant- petitioner to approach learned Single Judge in the pending writ proceedings to work out his rights and remedies. This Court does not express any opinion in that regard. 3. The contempt petition is not entertained and is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE hkh. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29