JAINARAYAN GURJAR S/O KHAJU GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/3710/2025 · 2025-07-14
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22162 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22162 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:26074] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3710/2025
1. Jainarayan Gurjar S/o Khaju Gurjar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Kala Ki Dhani, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur Rural, 303009, Rajasthan, India.
2. Mohan Chaudhary S/o Kana Ram Jaat, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Dev Nagar, Kala Ki Dhani, Ladana, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur Rural, Rajasthan, India.
3. Prem Devi W/o Khaju Gurjar, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Village Kala Ki Dhani, Ladana, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur Rural, 303009 Rajasthan, India. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, through PP
2. Banwari Lal Gurjar S/o Pokharmal Gurjar, R/o Kala Ki Dhani, Ladana, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur Rural, 303009, Rajasthan, India. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tejaswi Sharma, Adv.with Ms. Monika Kukereja, Adv. For State For Complainant(s) : : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP Ms. Harshita Sharma, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 14/07/2025
1. The present petition is filed for quashing of FIR No.0102/2005, dated 19.05.2025, registered at Police Station Phagi, District Jaipur Rural for offences under Sections 331(6), 115(2), 126(2), 74, 3(5) of BNS and consequential proceedings therein.
2.
Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that parties herein are neighbours and distant relatives. It is submitted that
[2025:RJ-JP:26074] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3710/2025] the petitioners have also lodged an FIR against the respondent- complainant. It is submitted that both the FIR’s are lodged with a concocted story.
3. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the parties have prayed for a liberty to file a representation before the competent authority and same be considered efficaciously by the concerned authority.
4. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstance of the case, this Court in light of the directions encapsulated in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2008) 2 SCC 409], directs that on 28.07.2025 at 11.00 AM and 12:00 AM respectively, both the parties shall mark their presence before concerned authority who shall give audience to the parties and take appropriate decision, strictly in accordance with law.
5. It is expected that the investigation be carried out in a fair and expeditious manner, in accordance with law.
6. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. It is made clear that filing of present petition will not prejudice the case of the respective parties.
7. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /32