APHC010312162019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 14508/2019 Between: 1. MADDINENI CHALAPATHI RAO, S/O M. CHINNA VENKATAIAH, AGE 36 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.31-4-81, AMMAVARI VEEDHI, ALLIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME) DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, OFFICE OF REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, III TOWN POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N SRIHARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.14508 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a writ or direction preferably Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents especially the respondents No.3 and 4 in contemplating to attach the premises by name Royal Visakha Beach Guest House situated at Plot No.10, D.No.7-5-32, Panduranga Puram, Beach Road Visakhapatnam pending consideration explanations dated 16.09.2019 and another explanation dated 18.09.2019 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 and also violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.3 and 4 not to attach the premises by name Royal Visakha Beach Guest House situated at Plot No.10, D.No.7-5-32, Panduranga Puram, Beach Road Visakhapatnam and pass…” 2. Sri N.Srihari, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 03.09.2025 Pmk 5 10 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:14508 OF 2019 Date: 03.09.2025 Pmk