Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22161 (GAU)

NABAJIT DEKA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.

WP(C)/215/2025 · 2025-01-28

Suman Shyam

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010273972024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/215/2025 NABAJIT DEKA S/O AMULYA DEKA, R/O VILL- KALNANI, P.O.-MADHUKUCHI, PIN-781354, DIST- KAMRUP, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, HOME DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE POLICE HEADQUARTERS ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI-781007 3:THE STATE LEVEL POLICE RECRUITMENT BOARD ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN ASSAM REHABARI GUWAHATI-781008 4:THE MEMBER CONVENER STATE LEVEL POLICE RECRUITMENT BOARD ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN ASSAM REHABARI GUWAHATI-781008 5:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMN) Page No.# 2/3 POLICE HEADQUARTERS ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI-78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR B P BORAH, MR. A KHANDAKAR,MR P J DUTTA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER Date : 29-01-2025 Heard Mr. B.P. Borah, learned counsel for the writ petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Bora, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam appearing for the State. The petitioner herein had participated in the recruitment process conducted through the State Level Police Recruitment Board (SLPRB) for filling up several posts including the vacant posts of Constable (B) under the Assam Police Border Organisation. The grievance of the petitioner is that although he has fared well in the selection process, no appointment order has been issued to his favour till date. Taking note of the grievance of the petitioner, this Court had granted time to the learned Govt. Advocate to obtain instruction in the matter. Today, when the matter is taken up, Mr. D. Bora, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam has produced written instruction, according to which, the petitioner has been selected and the process of issuance of appointment order in his favour is at an advance stage. If that be so, it is apparent that the grievance of the petitioner in this case has already been redressed. Mr. Bora, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam has also agreed to the said proposition. Page No.# 3/3 In view of the above, by retaining a copy of the written instruction dated 24-01- 2025, produced by the learned Govt. Advocate, Assam, this writ petition stands closed. JUDGE GS Comparing Assistant