Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22161 (AP)

K ESWAR REDDY v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/15982/2025 · 2025-07-01

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No.15982_2025 APHC010312722025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15982/2025 Between: 1. K ESWAR REDDY, S/O. LATE PAKKEERA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YRS, R/O. D. NO. 5/670/37, SHIRIDI NAGAR, SOMANDEPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PENUKONDA, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SOMANDEPALLI P.S., 6. 6 VARALAKSHMI, W/O. KRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YRS. 7. K KRISHNA REDDY, S/O. LATE K. GANGI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 57 YRS, 8. K DIVYASHREE, W/O. DEEPAK REDDY, AGED ABOUT 30 YRS. 2 HN, J W.P.No.15982_2025 9. A DEEPAK REDDY, S/O. LATE DEVA REDDY. AGED ABOUT 35 YRS ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ or any other order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 5TH respondent in not registering the FIR basing on the complaint dt. 13-06- 2025 (received on 16-06-2025) made by the petitioner against the respondent no. 6 to 9 is as illegal, arbitrary, violation of article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and contrary to the BNS and consequently direct the 5TH respondent to register the FIR above said complaint and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 5th respondent in registering the FIR basing on the complaint dt. 13-06-2025 (received on 16-06-2025) made by the petitioner against the respondent No. 6 to 9 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 HN, J W.P.No.15982_2025 The Court made the following Order: 1. Heard. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No.5 is not registering the crime pursuant to the petitioner’s complaint dated 13.06.2025. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home Department submits that the petitioner’s complaint dated 13.06.2025 will be considered by respondent Nos.5, as per the law. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to disposed off the Writ Petition at the stage of admission itself, directing respondent No.5 to consider the petitioner’s complaint dated 13.06.2025, in accordance with law and as per the procedure contemplated under Section 173(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, (for short, “BNSS”). As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 02.07.2025 JLV 4 HN, J W.P.No.15982_2025 172 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N Writ Petition No.15982 of 2025 Date: 02.07.2025 JLV