Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2216 (ORI)

BIJAYA KUMAR NAYAK v. SEBATI NAYAK

RPFAM/290/2025 · 2026-04-21

M S Sahoo

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No.290 of 2025 Bijaya Kumar Nayak …. Petitioner Mr. S. S. Das, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Jayanti Naik, Advocate -versus- Sebati Nayak …. Opp. Party Ms. Jayanti Panigrahi, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER 21.04.2026 Hybrid Mode 05. 1. Learned counsel Ms. Jayanti Panigrahi on behalf of the opposite party being present at the virtual Court, High Court of Orissa, Kandhamal at Phulbani addresses arguments. 2. On 28.01.2026 the following order was passed after hearing the learned counsel for the parties: “1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in absence of the arguing counsel Ms. Jayanti Naik, the matter may be adjourned. 2. Mrs. Jayanti Panigrahi, learned counsel is present at the virtual court, High Court of Orissa, Kandhamal at Phulbani and addresses arguments. She submits that the present application arises out of an order which was passed U/s.125 of Cr.P.C. (since repealed) in the National Lok Adalat by order dated 16.04.2021 the case being CRP No.18 of 2021. By the said order dated 16.04.2021 in CRP No.18 of 2021, the learned Judge, Family Court, Phulbani had allowed the petition filed by the opposite party-wife in the marriage. It is submitted that the order dated 16.04.2021 was sought to be p. 2 modified by the petitioner which was rejected and order of rejection is under challenge in the present writ application herein by filing application under Section 146 of the of Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has adjournment to address on the question of the scope of interference in the orders passed by the Lok Adalat. Learned counsel for the opposite party seeks one week time to file objection to the I.A. for condonation of delay. 4. Accordingly, the matter shall be listed ‘For Orders’ in the week commencing 09.02.2026.” 3. Today the matter being in the list is mentioned by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Memo of date is filed which states thus: “I do not want to proceed the above noted case as per the instruction of the petitioner, item no.16. Hence, the matter is withdrawn.” The memo shall be taken on record. Scanned copy be updated. 4. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of. Copy of this order shall be forwarded to the learned Judge, Family Court, Phulbani to be the kept on records of CRP No.129 of 2024 disposed of by judgment dated 02.06.2025. (Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge Gs