Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2216 (GAU)

Takom Darang and Anr v. The State of AP and 6 Ors

WP(C)/304/2025 · 2026-03-17

Robin Phukan

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040011252025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/304/2025 Takom Darang and Anr Son of Shri Late Tanujang Darang, Runne Village, PO Yagrung and PS Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Puntong Tamuk Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Tatem Tamuk Sibut Village PO and PS Pasighat East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 6 Ors represented by the Secretary, Department of Land, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar, PO and PS Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : East Siang District Govt of Arunachal Pradesh PO and PS Pasighat Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The District Land and Revenue and Settlement Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh PO and PS Pasighat East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. Page No.# 2/3 4:The Director Age: 0 Occupation : Department of Education Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar PO and PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 5:The Deputy Director of School Education Age: 0 Occupation : East Siang District Govt of Arunachal Pradesh PO and PS Pasighat East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 6:The Principal Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Middle School Paglek PO and PS Pasighat East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 7:All Bogong Student Union Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its Secretary PO and PS Pasighat East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Kago Taja, 1 K Ori,Nabam Talin,K Tagyang Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), SC (Education),Taba Tagum BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER 18.03.2026 Page No.# 3/3 Heard Mr. K. Taja, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. K. Wangmo, learned counsel for the State respondents. Mr. Taja submits that the petitioners are not willing to pursue this matter and therefore, he may be allowed to withdraw this petition. Prayer is allowed. This writ petition stands disposed of on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant