APHC010311972009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1392/2009 Between: Pulimini Yagna Narayana, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of A P Rep By Spl Pp ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SAI BABU Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: Mr.K.Sandeep, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor represented that the matter has become infructuous inasmuch as the case was withdrawn by the learned Special Public Prosecutor by way of filing a petition to withdraw the prosecution against the accused in respect of all charges. Accordingly, the petition was allowed and the accused was discharged in respect of all charges by the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada. 2. In view of the same, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J. Date: 12.02.2025 sj 109 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1392 of 2009 Date: 12.02.2025 sj