- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:45848 RSA No. 760 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 760 OF 2013 (DEC) BETWEEN: SRI V.A. GOPALAKRISHNA, S/O LATE ARASAYYA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, SUBHASHNAGAR, ARASIKERE TOWN, ARASIKERE PO, ARASIKERE TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 583 125. …APPELLANT (BY SRI N. SHANKARNARAYAN BHAT, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SRI RUDRAIAH, S/O LATE ERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O VOLAGEREHALLI VILLAGE, DUDDA HOBLI, DUDDA PO, HASSAN TALUK AND DIST. -573 118. 2. SRI KRISHNAIAH, S/O LATE ERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O VOLAGEREHALLI VILLAGE, DUDDA HOBLI, DUDDA PO, HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT -573 118. 3. SMT.LAKSHMAMMA, W/O PUTTASWAMY, D/O LATE PUTTASWAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, H.NO. 790, KUVEMPUNAGAR, HASSAN, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DIST. - 573 201. Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court Of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:45848 RSA No. 760 of 2013 4. SRI DEEPU, S/O LATE HONAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, MIG-42, KUVEMPUNAGAR, HASSAN, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DIST. - 573 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K. SHRIHARI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4 (ABSENT)) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 19.1.2013 PASSED IN R.A.NO.151/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HASSAN, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.9.2007 PASSED IN O.S.NO.256/2003 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) & JMFC II COURT, HASSAN. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT Though matter was passed over and called again, there is no representation. 2. Vide order dated 26.06.2024, appellant was permitted to comply with office objections on applications and notice was ordered. - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:45848 RSA No. 760 of 2013 3. Despite lapse of time, office objections are not complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligent in pursuing the appeal. Hence, applications are rejected. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE CPN CT: BHK