M/S NAVYANDHRA FODDER AND FORAGES v. M M NAYAK IAS
CC/3113/2024 · 2025-07-10
V Sujatha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22150 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22150 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 VS,J C.C.No.3113 of 2024
APHC010312382024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3113/2024 Between:
1. M/S NAVYANDHRA FODDER AND FORAGES, PRIVATE LIMITED REP., BY ITS DIRECTOR, POSAM MADHUSUDHANA REDDY S/O NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/O BELLAMKONDAVARIPALEM, TALLURU MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. M M NAYAK IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ANIMAL HUSBANDARY, DAIRY DEVELOPMENT AND FISHERIES DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI CAPITAL CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI AMARENDRA KUKMAR, DIRECTOR,DIRECTORATE OF ANIMAL HUSBANDARY DEPARTMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA.
3. SRI SATYANNARAYANA, COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (CFMS) GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI CAPITAL CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
4. V VINAY CHAND, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF A.P
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI CAPITAL CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2 VS,J C.C.No.3113 of 2024
5. BABY RANI, JOINT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to call for the Respondents/ Contemnors and punish them under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, for intentionally. Wantonly, and Deliberately not complying the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court dated 31-10-2023in W.P. 22426/2023 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to implead the proposed Respondents 6 to 9 Respondents/Contemnors NO.6 to 9 in the Contempt Case No. 3113/2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI The Court made the following:
3 VS,J C.C.No.3113 of 2024
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.22426 of 2023 on 31.10.2023, wherein this Court passed the following order:
“….dispose of the Writ Petition to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to clear the admitted bills as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.T.Sohit Chandhra,
learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner, has stated that the order dated 31.10.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.22426 of 2023 has been complied with by the respondents. Therefore, requested this Court to close the contempt case.
3. Recording the above submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 11.07.2025 KGR