Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22148 (AP)

Valluri Pradeep Chowdary, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/6386/2025 · 2025-07-02

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-A. ---he4¢ . IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMAmBgrig THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY, TWO THOU-SAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: `_ :\ __,a ,_ 'f: ..;:,I..fs£ _- |h -I, •.I: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6386 OF 2025 Betwee n : 1. Valluri Pradeep Chowdary,^¢S/o. Late Vijaya Raju, aged 26 years, R/o. Patemeda, Mandapeta, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Konaseema District, Andhra •'`!':-.-,,r. -+. Pradesh. i .,i.;I --;`r.`t i <(.{ `_ 2. Mumissa Siva Shankar @ Siva @ Mummina Siva Shankar, S/o. Ramu, aged 20 years, R/o. Gandhi Nagar, Near Chinna Masjid, Mandapeta, \`,.. t Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Konas6enia District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. Saka Srinuvasu, S/o. Pattabhiramanna, aged 36 years, R/o. Ravulapeta, Mandapeta, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Konaseema District, Andhra Pradesh. :.-t i 4. Karri Srinu, S/o. Jayakrishna, aged 30 years, R/o, Near Burugunda cheruvu, Mandapeta, Dr.B`.`R.Ambedkar Konaseema District, Andhra a.` Pradesh. 5. Penumaka Ayyappa, S'/o.. Satya-narayaha, aged 28 years, R/o. Sidulape{a, Mandapefa, Dr.B'.R.Ambedkar Konaseema District, Andhra Pradesh. .||Petitioners/Accused 1 |5 L` > f| -.--,-3-AND The State of Andhra Prades_h, 'Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High court of Andhra Pradesh,l`'''High Court Buildings at Nelapadu, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. [Mandapeta Town Police Station] .I.Respondent/Complainant Petition under Sections 480..& 483 of BNSS, is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the grQllndS filed in Support Of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased t6 grant bail to the petitI'OnerS/Accused No. 1 i `` to 5 in connection with Crime rdQ.171 of 2025 on the file of the Mandapeta 'rJ;:!` Town Police Station, Dr.B.R,Ambedkar Konaseema District, Andhra Pradesh. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V.Sail i -2 I •L``!\J! - Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioners and of Public Prosecutor for Respondent •_:,_.:I No.1, the Court made the following •} i <" .J.i i ' !-:_,I; ,:li m`-i APHCO10312112025 lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3 327] PRESENT, THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY £R[M[NAL PETITION NO: 6386/2025 Between : 1.VALLURI PRADEEP CHOWDARYH S/O. LATE VIJAYA RAJU, AGED 26 YEARS, R/O. PATEMEDA, MANDAPETA, DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2.MUMISSA SIVA SHANKAR @ SIVA @ MUMMINA SIVA SHANKARu S/O. RAMU, AGED 20 YEARS, R/O. GANDHI NAGAR, NEAR CHINNA MASJID, MANDAPETA, DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3.SAKA SRINUVASUu S/O. PATTABHIRAMANNA, AGED 36 YEARS, R/O. RAVULAPETA, MANDAPETA, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4.KARRI SRINUH S/O. JAYAKRISHNA, AGED 30 YEARS, R/O. NEAR BURUGUNDA CHERUVU, MANDAPETA, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. PENUMAKA AYYAPPAu S/O. SATYANARAYANA, AGED 28 YEARS, R/O. SIDULAPETA, MANDAPETA, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. HIPETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS AT NELAPADU, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. MANDAPETA TOWN POLICE STATION ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT SIi= .`_a .- 2 counsel for the petitioner/accused(s): 1.V SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court mad`e the following: Order:- This Criminal Petition, under sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioners/Al to A5, seeking regular bail, in crime No,171 of 2025 of Mandapeta Town Poll-Ce Station, Kakinada District. 2. A case has been registered against the petitioners herein for the offences punishable under sections 109(1) r/w 3(5) of BNS. 3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, on 27.05.2025 at about 4,00 pm, the accused went to Rajaratna Bar, Mandapeta to consume alcohol and at that time the defacto complainant and some others sat opposite table of the accused and while they were consuming liquor and they were talkI|ng loudly. On that, the petitioners questioned them as to why they were talking loudly and asked them to talk softly. When the defacto complainant and others came out of the bar, the petitioners raised quarrel and Al beat with a beer bottle on the head of the injured and A2 beat him wI'th a brick On his head causing <z;' 3 bleeding injury and other persons also beat him with hands and legs with a view to eliminate him. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Public ,Prosecutor. Perused the record. 5. On perusal of the record, it appears that a quarrel took place between the defacto complainant and the accused. Under sudden and grave provocation, accused assaulted the defacto complainant with a beer bottle, resulting in the defacto complainant sustaining simple injuries. The quarrel between the parties appears to have been as a result of sudden provocation. The petitioners are in judicial remand since 28.05.2025. 6. ln view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners/Al to A5 on the following conditions. i) The petitioners/Al to A5 shall be released on bail on their executing personal bond for Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each with two sureties of the like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, AIamuru. ij) On release, the petitioners shall appear be for-e the Station House Officer concerned, once in a week i.e. on every '` .` 4 sunday, between 10-.00 am and o5.00 pm, till filing of the charge sheet and the petitioners shall make themselves available for investigatI-On aS and when required and that they shall not cause any threat, inducement or promllSe tO the Prosecution Witnesses. iji) lt is made clear that the petitioners shall scrupulously comply wI|th the above conditions and breach of any of the above conditions will be viewed seriously and prosecution is at liberty to move an applI'CatjOn for cancellation of the bail. 7. Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. SD/-M.SRINIVAS //TRUE COPY// :: :i::i_NiZ5G ISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The XII Additional SessI'OnS Judge, Ramchandrapuram. 2. The Judicial Magistrate of First class, Alamuru. 3. The Superintendent, Sub-Jail, Ramachandrapuram. 4. The Station House Officer, Mandapeta Police Station, Dr. B.R.Ambedkar Konaseema District. 5. One CC to Sri V.Sai Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs toPUBLIC+ PROSECUTOR, High Court of A.P., Amaravati. [OUT] 7. One spare copy. PSD \--- HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED :03/07/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.6386 of 2025 ALLOWED 'ife '