Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22139 (BOM)

SUDAM MALHARI SONNAR v. THE EX. ENGINEER, OSMANABAD MED. PRO. DIV. OSMANABAD AND ORS

CA/9122/2024 · 2025-01-22

Shri Sanjay A Deshmukh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

954 CA 9122-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 954 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9122 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1113 OF 2021 SUDAM MALHARI SONNAR VERSUS THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER OSMANABAD MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION OSMANABAD AND OTHERS ... Mr. Dnyaneshwar A. Bide – Advocate for Applicant Mr. Gulab B. Rajale – Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr. Rajdeep D. Raut – AGP for Respondent Nos.2 and 3, State …. CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 22nd JANUARY, 2025 PER COURT : 1. This is an application filed for permission to withdraw the amount of compensation of Rs.8,23,415/-. 2. Perused the application. Heard learned advocates for applicant and respondent No.1 and learned A.G.P. for respondent Nos.2 and 3, State. 3. Learned advocate for applicant submits that, already 42,00,000/- are withdrawn as per directions of this Court. The acquiring body had deposited 75% amount in this Court as per the award. Pooja Kale 1/2 2025:BHC-AUG:1939 954 CA 9122-2024 4. Considering all these facts and circumstances, it would be proper to allow the application in terms of prayer clause ‘B’. The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ on condition that, the amount of Rs.8,23,415/- alongwith accrued interest thereon to be paid to the claimant on execution of solvent surety to the satisfaction of the learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. 5. The application is disposed of. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH ] JUDGE Pooja Kale 2/2