2025:JHHC:21717 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 7289 of 2017 Silwanti Mahto Wife of Hira Lal Mahto Resident of Village Diggi Lota, Sonuwa P.O. and P.S. Sonuwa District West Singhbhum. ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Secretary, Social Welfare, Women and Child Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, office at Project Building, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 3. The Director, Social Welfare, Women and Child Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, office at Project Building, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 4. The Divisional Commissioner, Singhhbhum (Kolhan Division), Chaibasa P.O. and P.S. Chaibasa, District West Singhbhum. 5. The Deputy Director, Welfare Department (Kolhan Division), Chaibasa P.O. and P.S. Chaibasa, District West Singhbhum. 6. Sunanda Devi Wife of Naradmuni Kumar, resident of Baghbera Colony, Road No.06, Behind Quarter No.37/1, P.O. and P.S. Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum. 7. Sumitra Nag Wife of Dilip Nag, resident of Village and Post Nimdih, P.S. Chandli District Seraikella Kharsawan. 8. Padmawati Bera, Wife of Deodutta Bera resident of Village and Post Khandamoda, P.S. Ghashila, District East Singhbhum. 9. Sangita Kumari Wife of Rajesh Ravi, resident of Hind Chowk, Bari Bazar, P.O. and P.S. Chaibasa, District West Singhbhum. 10. Dangani Soren Wife of Devendra Kumar Mardi, resident of Village Chotabana, P.O. Dholadih, P.S. Rajnagar, District Seraikella Kharsawan. 11. Naso Murmu Wife of Vishnu Kumar Murmu resident of Village Hiraganj, P.O. Adelbera, P.S. Ghatshila, District East Singhbhum. 12. Sabro Mardi Wife of Surendra Nath Mardi resident of Paharpur, P.O. Asana, P.S. Ghatshila, District East Singhbhum. 13. Mejondri Samad Wife of Parmesh Chandra Samad, Village Boradoro, PO and P.S. Gopinathpur District West Singhbhum, Chaibasa. 14. Basanti Tudu Wife of Kesu Manjhi resident of Village Mirudih, P.O. Chowk, P.S. Chowk District Seraikella Kharsawan. 15. Shanti Hembrom Wife of Rupendra Nath Hembrom resident of Village Gopalpur, P.O. Ghatshila, P.S. Ghatshila, District East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur. 16. Rakhi Das Wife of Durga Das resident of Village Dehridih, P.O. and 2025:JHHC:21717 2 PS- Kharsawan, District Seraikella Kharsawan. 17. Anuradha Sharma Wife Basant Lal Chabra, resident of Near Subhash School, Jagdishpur Road, Harhargutu, P.O. Harhargutu, P.S. Baghbera, District East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur. 18. Seema Mukhi Wife of Sumant Kumar Mukhi resident of Village and P.O. Rajnagar, P.S. Rajnagar, District Seraikella Kharsawan. 19. Sapani Mai Kudada Wife of Late Manoj Godsora, resident of Village Baduri, P.O. and P.S. Nakahasa, District West Singhbhum. 20. Sarsawati Manjhi wife of Tika Ram Manjhi resident of Village and Post Dhirol, P.S. Potka, Singhbhum. Block Potka, District East Singhbhum … … Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner Nos. 1 & 3 :Mr. Amitabh, Advocate For the Petitioner No.2 : None For the Respondent(s) :Mr. Manish Mishra, Advocate Mr. Raunak Sahay, Advocate -------- Order No. 17 /Dated: 4th August 2025 During course of proceeding vide order dated 24.02.2025 at the request of Mr. Amitabh, learned counsel representing petitioner nos. 1 and 3, the Court has passed the following order: “At the outset, Mr. Amitabh, learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that he does not want to rely upon the amended writ petition, as the same is already defective and not in consonance with the earlier order. 2. He submits that he has filed fresh vakalatnama on behalf of petitioner No.1 – Kaushaliya Shandil and petitioner No.3 – Dashmati Birua. He submits that he has received instruction to withdraw this writ petition so far as it relates to petitioner Nos.1 & 3, with liberty to file a fresh writ petition on the same and future cause of action. He submits that since the pleadings have become so complicated, it is necessary to simplify the same by filing a fresh writ petition so that prayer of each of the parties may not intermingled. 3. Considering the submission, I allow this writ petition to be withdrawn on behalf of petitioner Nos.1 & 3. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn qua petitioner No.1 – Kaushaliya Shandil and petitioner No.3 – Dashmati Birua, with the aforesaid liberty. 5. Now, this writ petition (without amendment) will only be confined to petitioner No.2 – Silwanti Mahto.” 2. Today no one appears on behalf of Petitioner, namely, Silwanti Mahto. 3. After going through the aforesaid order, it appears that Mr. Amitabh, 2025:JHHC:21717 3 learned counsel filed a fresh Vakalatnama on behalf of petitioner nos. 1 and 3 and then seeks liberty to file a fresh writ application on behalf of petitioner nos. 1 and 3. Since no one is appearing on behalf of petitioner, namely, Silwanti Mahto, interest of justice would be sufficed by giving liberty to the present petitioner also to file a fresh writ application raising her grievance in view of the fact that no one is appearing on her behalf. 4. Having regard to the aforesaid circumstances, the instant writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner, namely, Silwanti Mahto to file a fresh writ application, if so advised. 5. Pending I.As, if any, also stand disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amit